We all know about Solyndra going belly up. We all know about the $540 Million loan guarantee signed by our president. But did you know that The GAO and Price Waterhouse both told the president that this was not an investment grade company? He was urged over many months to back off and reconsider, but Obama was adamant and chose to spend our money against the best advice available.
Obama may be the President but he works for us and he has a fiduciary duty to manage our money well. This situation clearly demonstrates his complete lack of responsibility towards us and his inability to make good financial decisions.
Like anyone who is negligent when handling others money, Obama is culpable and owes us more than just a duty, he owes us our money back.
I propose we seize all his assets, his home, his Nobel prize, the revenue from his books, all the money in his campaign fund and whatever else it takes to reimburse the taxpayers for his fraudelent mishandling of our money.
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Sunday, September 25, 2011
Are Americans finally realizing the evil behind the Democrat
the historic victory of a Republican winning a New York seat that has been dominated by Democrats since 1922, it would appear they have. This is no way a small victory, the repercussions of this are going to be far-reaching and reverberating across America as a win against obama's Communist anti-American agenda and the taking back of America by we the people.
The dominos are starting to fall faster each day for obama and the Democrats are well aware of this, how could they not be?
obama's last ditch effort to try and convince Americans his "Jobs Plan" is the saving grace is anything but, and Congress is NOT going to give obama free reign on spending us further into oblivion with "promises" anymore.
obama and the Democrats are burnt toast and they know it. ALL of them up for re-election are trying to distance themselves from obama as fast as they can but their stench cannot be wiped away. They ALL have the obama Albatross around their necks and cannot shake it off.
CIA’s and Facebook
Remember when Mark Zuckerberg said you need to get over the fact that there is no privacy on the internet?
Many of you have likely viewed the video below. It documents Facebook’s connection to the CIA.
Many people, however, think the fun of posting on and the interaction of Facebook overshadows the downside, or they merely ignore the negative aspects.
Well, it turns out it is worse than we previously thought.
Hacker and writer Nik Cubrilovic has a post on his blog today revealing some really scary and downright police state Stasi-like aspects of the popular “service” that doubles as a data-mining operation for the CIA.
Cubrilovic writes that Facebook keeps track of every website destination you visit, even if YOU ARE LOGGED OUT OF FACEBOOK. It does this through the cookies it routinely plants on your computer.
This is somewhat of an overstatement. In fact, Facebook is only able to do this on pages that have its “Like” button on it, which is to say a lot of webpages, although hardly all.
The only solution to this is to delete Facebook’s cookies after every session, or use a separate browser for Facebook usage.
Cubrilovic explains: “With my browser logged out of Facebook, whenever I visit any page with a Facebook like button, or share button, or any other widget, the information, including my account ID, is still being sent to Facebook. The only solution to Facebook not knowing who you are is to delete all Facebook cookies… It is all hidden in plain sight.”
Cubrilovic tried to email Facebook about his concerns on several occasions, but they ignored him.
For most people, this is probably not much of a concern, but for people who are political “radicals” – and anybody who holds political views outside those deemed acceptable by the establishment are indeed considered radicals – this is a serious issue.
Again, Facebook is connected to the CIA and the DIA. It is common knowledge, so much so it is now the subject of satire.
Facebook’s op compliments the NSA effort to “vaccum” up countless petabytes of personal data of citizens, described as “the largest database ever assembled in the world.” It is an integral part of what we call the “surveillance grid” here on Infowars.com.
If you want to minimize your exposure to the grid, it may be time to say good-bye to Facebook, especially if you are politically active.
Start by deactivating your Facebook account and deleting the cookies on your computer.
Many of you have likely viewed the video below. It documents Facebook’s connection to the CIA.
Many people, however, think the fun of posting on and the interaction of Facebook overshadows the downside, or they merely ignore the negative aspects.
Well, it turns out it is worse than we previously thought.
Hacker and writer Nik Cubrilovic has a post on his blog today revealing some really scary and downright police state Stasi-like aspects of the popular “service” that doubles as a data-mining operation for the CIA.
Cubrilovic writes that Facebook keeps track of every website destination you visit, even if YOU ARE LOGGED OUT OF FACEBOOK. It does this through the cookies it routinely plants on your computer.
This is somewhat of an overstatement. In fact, Facebook is only able to do this on pages that have its “Like” button on it, which is to say a lot of webpages, although hardly all.
The only solution to this is to delete Facebook’s cookies after every session, or use a separate browser for Facebook usage.
Cubrilovic explains: “With my browser logged out of Facebook, whenever I visit any page with a Facebook like button, or share button, or any other widget, the information, including my account ID, is still being sent to Facebook. The only solution to Facebook not knowing who you are is to delete all Facebook cookies… It is all hidden in plain sight.”
Cubrilovic tried to email Facebook about his concerns on several occasions, but they ignored him.
For most people, this is probably not much of a concern, but for people who are political “radicals” – and anybody who holds political views outside those deemed acceptable by the establishment are indeed considered radicals – this is a serious issue.
Again, Facebook is connected to the CIA and the DIA. It is common knowledge, so much so it is now the subject of satire.
Facebook’s op compliments the NSA effort to “vaccum” up countless petabytes of personal data of citizens, described as “the largest database ever assembled in the world.” It is an integral part of what we call the “surveillance grid” here on Infowars.com.
If you want to minimize your exposure to the grid, it may be time to say good-bye to Facebook, especially if you are politically active.
Start by deactivating your Facebook account and deleting the cookies on your computer.
Saturday, September 24, 2011
White House’s Testimony ‘Prep Guidance’
A second government official has come forward saying the White House tried to influence his testimony concerning a wireless broadband project backed by a Democratic donor that military officials fear might impair sensitive satellite navigation systems.
Anthony Russo, director of the National Coordination Office for Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing, told The Daily Beast he rejected “guidance” from the White House’s Office of Budget and Management suggesting he tell Congress that the government’s concerns about the project by the firm LightSquared could be resolved in 90 days, a timetable favorable to the company’s plans.
Russo said he objected to that language because “I have low confidence that we can complete all of the testing in 90 days.” He estimated that such testing would take at least six months. Russo called the White House efforts to alter his testimony “guidance rather than pressure.”Russo’s comments come just days after four-star Air Force Gen. William Shelton, who heads U.S. Space Command, told Congress in a classified briefing that he felt pressured by the White House to change his testimony about the same project to make it more favorable to the company.
Shelton also rejected the suggested edits and testified he has concerns LightSquared’s project could interfere with Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) signals key to military navigation and targeting systems.
Eric Schultz, a White House spokesman, said the OMB review of the witness testimony was routine and not designed to curry political favor, and that all the witnesses who testified to Congress were allowed to state their concerns about the LightSquared project and its potential ramifications for conflicting with GPS signals.
House Republicans now want to know whether the White House’s suggested edits to the testimony amounted to an effort to help the company.Falcone who owns a majority stake in LightSquared, told the Beast that while he met with White House officials and a federal regulator he “did not ask for any special favors and we have not asked for any special handouts, and consequently did not receive any special favors or handouts.”
“Everything is already set up, the labs are set up. All we need are the list of devices that need to be tested. We have been telling the people who are asking for the testing of this for months now,” he said in an interview MondayThe Beast obtained the paragraph the OMB asked government witnesses to insert into their recent congressional testimony, which says in part, “We hope that testing can be complete within 90 days.”
LightSquared has told Congress and regulators that the strength of its signal was approved in the mid 2000s by a Republican-led Federal Communications Commission and that its proposal to convert its satellite license to one for terrestrial mobile wireless devices would not change these interference issues.Nonetheless, the issue of the timeline for testing is crucial to LightSquared, which wants to build a wireless broadband service on a spectrum close to GPS signals as part of President Obama’s mandate to expand wireless access for Americans.
“The FCC mandated the most aggressive build-out in the history of telecommunications,” Falcone said. “We expect that we will have consumers on this network by the second half of 2012.”
Harold Furchtgott-Roth, a former Republican-appointed FCC commissioner, said it was highly unusual to put a timeline on the kinds of technical tests discussed in the OMB paragraph.
“Primarily these types of tests sometimes have a finite end and sometimes they don’t,” he said. “Sometimes they go on for long periods of time. To pick a number and say the tests have to end by a certain date is not consistent with commission precedent. Secondly, you don’t know what you will find when you do the test; you can’t predetermine that you will absolutely be finished after 90 days.”
Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA), the chairman of the House Science Committee’s Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, said he was troubled that four out of the five government witnesses before his Sept. 8 hearing had “identical language in their written testimony reflecting the administration’s view of the LightSquared project. The language diminished the otherwise blunt assessments the witnesses articulated during the hearing when pressed by committee members.”
Falcone said he does not believe he has received any favors from the White House. “I met in September of 2009 with somebody from the Office of Science and Technology. I never met Obama and I never met his advisers,” he said. “The discussion was around wireless in the marketplace and some of the things we were thinking and some of the different things we were doing.”
Furchtgott-Roth questioned the process by which the FCC granted a waiver to LightSquared so that it may use its initial license for satellite bandwidth to service terrestrial mobile devices.
“They gave that to me and presumably the other witnesses,” Russo said. “There is one sentence I disagreed with, which said that I thought the testing could be resolved in 90 days. So I took it out.”
Russo said he objected to that language because “I have low confidence that we can complete all of the testing in 90 days.” He estimated that such testing would take at least six months. Russo called the White House efforts to alter his testimony “guidance rather than pressure.”
Shelton also rejected the suggested edits and testified he has concerns LightSquared’s project could interfere with Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) signals key to military navigation and targeting systems.
Eric Schultz, a White House spokesman, said the OMB review of the witness testimony was routine and not designed to curry political favor, and that all the witnesses who testified to Congress were allowed to state their concerns about the LightSquared project and its potential ramifications for conflicting with GPS signals.
“Every administration witness testifying at every hearing on LightSquared has been explicit in identifying the problems it would cause for GPS, and that LightSquared should not be allowed to move forward unless those interference issues are resolved,” he said. “If OMB professionals were making sure that testimony before Congress was consistent with administration policy, that means they were doing their jobs because OMB reviews and clears all agency communications with Congress, including testimony, to ensure consistency in the administration’s policy positions.”
“We did not ask for any special favors and we have not asked for any special handouts, and consequently did not receive any special favors or handouts,” Falcone said. House Republicans now want to know whether the White House’s suggested edits to the testimony amounted to an effort to help the company.
Falcone acknowledged, however, he told anyone in the federal government willing to listen that testing his company’s signal for GPS interference on commercial and military equipment “should not take that long.”
“Everything is already set up, the labs are set up. All we need are the list of devices that need to be tested. We have been telling the people who are asking for the testing of this for months now,” he said in an interview MondayThe Beast obtained the paragraph the OMB asked government witnesses to insert into their recent congressional testimony, which says in part, “We hope that testing can be complete within 90 days.”
LightSquared has told Congress and regulators that the strength of its signal was approved in the mid 2000s by a Republican-led Federal Communications Commission and that its proposal to convert its satellite license to one for terrestrial mobile wireless devices would not change these interference issues.
“The FCC mandated the most aggressive build-out in the history of telecommunications,” Falcone said. “We expect that we will have consumers on this network by the second half of 2012.”
Harold Furchtgott-Roth, a former Republican-appointed FCC commissioner, said it was highly unusual to put a timeline on the kinds of technical tests discussed in the OMB paragraph.
“Primarily these types of tests sometimes have a finite end and sometimes they don’t,” he said. “Sometimes they go on for long periods of time. To pick a number and say the tests have to end by a certain date is not consistent with commission precedent. Secondly, you don’t know what you will find when you do the test; you can’t predetermine that you will absolutely be finished after 90 days.”
Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA), the chairman of the House Science Committee’s Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, said he was troubled that four out of the five government witnesses before his Sept. 8 hearing had “identical language in their written testimony reflecting the administration’s view of the LightSquared project. The language diminished the otherwise blunt assessments the witnesses articulated during the hearing when pressed by committee members.”
Last week, the Center for Public Integrity first reported a batch of emails between LightSquared executives and staffers of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. The nonprofit investigative journalism organization reported that LightSquared CEO Sanjiv Ahuja met with the chief of staff for OSTP just eight days before Falcone and his wife gave $30,400 each to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC). Ahuja also contributed $30,400 to the Democratic Party, though he made the same contribution to the Republican Party in 2009.
Falcone told The Daily Beast he made the donations to the DSCC because his wife was hosting a fundraiser for women in politics. “She asked me to contribute,” he said. “If I had said no, all hell would have broken loose.” He also said in a separate interview with Fox News that he was a registered Republican.
Falcone had one meeting with an official from the OSTP, he told The Daily Beast. He also said he met with FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski in September 2009. “I did not want the FCC to be surprised,” he said. “It was a kind of in and out thing.” Falcone told The Daily Beast he made the donations to the DSCC because his wife was hosting a fundraiser for women in politics. “She asked me to contribute,” he said. “If I had said no, all hell would have broken loose.” He also said in a separate interview with Fox News that he was a registered Republican.
Falcone said he does not believe he has received any favors from the White House. “I met in September of 2009 with somebody from the Office of Science and Technology. I never met Obama and I never met his advisers,” he said. “The discussion was around wireless in the marketplace and some of the things we were thinking and some of the different things we were doing.”
Furchtgott-Roth questioned the process by which the FCC granted a waiver to LightSquared so that it may use its initial license for satellite bandwidth to service terrestrial mobile devices.
RICK PERRY IS A SEX ADDICT
I don't know how these rumors start, but it seems like there is a new one just about every week. I like to publicize them so we can get them out there and debunked before they go viral on the internet.
This is one of the most ridiculous rumors about Rick Perry that I have seen. The others weren't too believable, either, and for those of you who did not hear about them, they are, "RICK PERRY IS A HERMAPHRODITE," and, "RICK PERRY BEATS HIS WIFE."
I think the best way to fight these scurrilous rumors is to inform the public and tell as many people that we can, that the rumor, "RICK PERRY IS A SEX ADDICT," is just a rumor. There is absolutely no evidence, which I have seen, that proves, "RICK PERRY IS A SEX ADDICT."
Please, tell all your friends that all three rumors, "RICK PERRY IS A SEX ADDICT," "RICK PERRY IS A HERMAPHRODITE," and, "RICK PERRY BEATS HIS WIFE," are not TRUE. If you have heard any other rumors, please post them so we can get them out to the public and prove they have no merit.
This is one of the most ridiculous rumors about Rick Perry that I have seen. The others weren't too believable, either, and for those of you who did not hear about them, they are, "RICK PERRY IS A HERMAPHRODITE," and, "RICK PERRY BEATS HIS WIFE."
I think the best way to fight these scurrilous rumors is to inform the public and tell as many people that we can, that the rumor, "RICK PERRY IS A SEX ADDICT," is just a rumor. There is absolutely no evidence, which I have seen, that proves, "RICK PERRY IS A SEX ADDICT."
Please, tell all your friends that all three rumors, "RICK PERRY IS A SEX ADDICT," "RICK PERRY IS A HERMAPHRODITE," and, "RICK PERRY BEATS HIS WIFE," are not TRUE. If you have heard any other rumors, please post them so we can get them out to the public and prove they have no merit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)